Caring about carelessness: Participant inattention and its effects on researchMichael R. Maniaci, Ronald David Rogge2013-10-07articleJournal of Research in Personality852 citationsclosedNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Survey Methodology and NonresponsePsychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Testing and AssessmentAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 852 citations exist upstream.References1965Society and the Adolescent Self-Image1990Personality Structure: Emergence of the Five-Factor Model2003Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.1985Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice2012Identifying careless responses in survey data.2009Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power2008Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice1984Two-component models of socially desirable responding.Cited by2022Dealing with Careless Responding in Survey Data: Prevention, Identification, and Recommended Best Practices2017Are Attention Check Questions a Threat to Scale Validity?2017Meaningfulness as Satisfaction of Autonomy, Competence, Relatedness, and Beneficence: Comparing the Four Satisfactions and Positive Affect as Predictors of Meaning in Life2020Got Bots? Practical Recommendations to Protect Online Survey Data from Bot Attacks2019Controlling for Response Biases in Self-Report Scales: Forced-Choice vs. Psychometric Modeling of Likert Items2016Intra-individual Response Variability as an Indicator of Insufficient Effort Responding: Comparison to Other Indicators and Relationships with Individual Differences2018Autonomy, Competence, Relatedness, and Beneficence: A Multicultural Comparison of the Four Pathways to Meaningful Work2017Dirty Data: The Effects of Screening Respondents Who Provide Low-Quality Data in Survey Research