SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The myth of ballistic processing: Evidence from Stroop’s paradigm · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleThe myth of ballistic processing: Evidence from Stroop’s paradigm

Derek Besner2001

Article2001

The myth of ballistic processing: Evidence from Stroop’s paradigm

78 citations·0/0 files stored·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Reading and Literacy Development Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 78 citations exist upstream.

References

1998Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails.1997The stroop effect and the myth of automaticity 1995Intrusive cognitions: An investigation of the emotional Stroop task.1992The role of spatial attention in visual word processing.1999What kind of attention modulates the Stroop effect?2000A dual-task investigation of automaticity in visual word processing.

Cited by

2006Neuroticism and affective priming: Evidence for a neuroticism-linked negative schema 2006Attentional Load Attenuates Synaesthetic Priming Effects in Grapheme-Colour Synaesthesia 2009Can suggestion obviate reading? Supplementing primary Stroop evidence with exploratory negative priming analyses 2016The magic of words reconsidered: Investigating the automaticity of reading color-neutral words in the Stroop task.2004Competing for a Desired Reward in the Stroop Task: When Attentional Control is Unconscious but Effective Versus Conscious but Ineffective.

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

1999Unconsciously controlled processing: the stroop effect reconsideredarticle · 3 shared references 2004Competing for a Desired Reward in the Stroop Task: When Attentional Control is Unconscious but Effective Versus Conscious but Ineffective.article · 3 shared references 2001What do double dissociations prove?article · 2 shared references 1999What kind of attention modulates the Stroop effect?article · 2 shared references 2000A dual-task investigation of automaticity in visual word processing.article · 2 shared references 2012Suggestion does not de-automatize word reading: Evidence from the semantically based Stroop taskarticle · 2 shared references

Details

Year2001

Typearticle

Published2001-06-01

VenuePsychonomic Bulletin & Review

ISSN-L1069-9384

Languageen

Citations78

Files0 public / 0

ShelfReading and Literacy Development

Identifiers

doi10.3758/bf03196168

openalex_workW1992016826

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.