Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

An analysis of general medical and specialist journals that endorse CONSORT found that reporting was not enforced consistently

16 references·16 citing·40 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
2004Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement1,588 cited
2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
1996The CONSORT Statement736 cited
1996Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement610 cited
1994Assessing the Quality of Randomization From Reports of Controlled Trials Published in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals512 cited
2004Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research442 cited
2002Quality of Reporting of Randomized Trials as a Measure of Methodologic Quality397 cited
2001Value of Flow Diagrams in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials316 cited
2001CONSORT Revised—Improving the Reporting of Randomized Trials294 cited
2002Reporting Number Needed to Treat and Absolute Risk Reduction in Randomized Controlled Trials239 cited
2002In the dark The reporting of blinding status in randomized controlled trials

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

173 cited

1998Discussion Sections in Reports of Controlled Trials Published in General Medical Journals169 cited

2002The reporting of methodological factors in randomized controlled trials and the association with a journal policy to promote adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist167 cited

Cited by

2015Quality of Conduct and Reporting of Meta-analyses of Surgical Interventions76 cited
2014Oncology trial abstracts showed suboptimal improvement in reporting: a comparative before-and-after evaluation using CONSORT for Abstract guidelines76 cited
2013CONSORT Compliance in Surgical Randomized Trials68 cited
2006Reproducibility of the STARD checklist: an instrument to assess the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies66 cited
2007Quality of Reporting of Key Methodological Items of Randomized Controlled Trials in Clinical Ophthalmic Journals61 cited
2010Influence of trial registration on reporting quality of randomized trials: Study from highest ranked journals60 cited
2018The Impact of STRICTA and CONSORT on Reporting of Randomised Control Trials of Acupuncture: A Systematic Methodological Evaluation60 cited
2010Randomized Controlled Trials of Acupuncture (1997–2007): An Assessment of Reporting Quality with a CONSORT‐ and STRICTA‐Based Instrument46 cited
2013Are Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials Improving over Time? A Systematic Review of 284 Articles Published in High-Impact General and Specialized Medical Journals46 cited
2017The Conduct and Reporting of Child Health Research: An Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in 2012 and Evaluation of Change over 5 Years41 cited
2006Systematic Evaluation of the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials in Diabetes38 cited
2017The use of tailored subheadings was successful in enhancing compliance with CONSORT in a dental journal36 cited
2008How good is the orthopaedic literature?33 cited
2011Quality of Reporting of Neonatal and Infant Trials in High-Impact Journals30 cited
2017Impact of the CONSORT Statement endorsement in the completeness of reporting of randomized clinical trials in restorative dentistry30 cited
2014Impact of the Transparent Reporting of Evaluations With Nonrandomized Designs Reporting Guideline: Ten Years On30 cited