Hominid Ichnotaxonomy: An Exploration of a Neglected Discipline

Abstract

Although more than 60 ancient hominid track sites ranging in age from 3.7 million to less than 500 B. P. are recorded from all continents except Antarctica, no ichnotaxonomic names have ever been formally proposed for hominid tracks. There is no prohibition to the naming of fossil footprints of species that created tracks and trackways similar to those of living species. On the contrary, there is precedent for the naming of ichnotaxa corresponding to the dominant extant vertebrates classes: mammals = Mammalipedia and birds = Avipeda. The hominid track site sample includes only about a dozen sites where footprint preservation is good enough to show details of diagnostic foot morphology and typical trackway morphology. We infer that the Acahualinca Footprint Museum site in Nicaragua represents the most important ancient hominid track site that combines accessibility, a large sample of well-preserved trackways and reliable dating. For this reason, we select the Nicaraguan tracks as the type sample for the new ichnotaxon Hominipes modernus ichnogen., and ichnsp. et ichnosp. nov., which we infer to represent fully modern Homo sapiens. Our preliminary investigations of other track sites suggest that the majority also yield H. modernus. However, at many sites preservation is insufficient to make an ichnotaxonomic designation at the species level or to infer that the trackmaker was H. sapiens. Thus, at many sites including the famous Laetoli site, we apply the more general label of Hominipes isp. indet.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 46 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.