Input Substitution and the Distribution of Surplus Gains from Lower U.S. Beef‐Processing Costs

Abstract

Abstract Analysis of a switch from boxed beef to tray‐ready beef processing demonstrates that limited substitution between farm and nonfarm inputs has a significant impact on the distribution of surplus gains. A two‐input, two‐output (beef and by‐products) industry model was specified. Technical change was modeled as a shift in marketing input supply. This approach yields equivalent results to a demand increase from biased technical change. Using an estimated elasticity of substitution of 0.1 and parameter values from previous studies, the results indicate cattle producers would receive either 57% or 72% of surplus gains depending upon whether input substitution occurs.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 48 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.