SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The EQUATOR network and website
0 references·5 citing·15 second hop
The EQUATOR network and website (2007)The EQUATOR network and websiteSex differences in 3‐ to 5‐year‐old children's motor competence: A pooled cross‐sectional analysis of 6241 children (2024)Sex differences in 3‐ to 5‐ye…Enhancing the quality of reporting of orthodontic clinical research (2024)Enhancing the quality of repo…Author instructions in biomedical journals infrequently address systematic review reporting and methodology: a cross-sectional study (2023)Author instructions in biomed…Recommendations for Writing Clinical Research Manuscripts: From Monofocal to Multifocal Intraocular Lenses (2022)Recommendations for Writing C…Reliability and validity of MINCIR scale for methodological quality in dental therapy research (2014)Reliability and validity of M…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)PEDro. A database of randomized trials and systematic reviews in physiotherapy (2000)An AMSTAR assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of oral healthcare interventions published in the Journal of Applied Oral Science (JAOS) (2011)Instructions for the Use of MInCiR Scale to Assess Methodological Quality in Prognosis Studies (2015)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Guidance for systematic reviews in journal author instructions: Findings and recommendations for editorial teams (2024)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Understanding Motor Development: Infants, Children, Adolescents, Adults (1994)Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. (1999)Correlates of Gross Motor Competence in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2016)Development of Basic Motor Skills from 3 to 10 Years of Age: Comparison by Sex and Age Range in Chilean Children (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2024Sex differences in 3‐ to 5‐year‐old children's motor competence: A pooled cross‐sectional analysis of 6241 children24 cited
  • 2014Reliability and validity of MINCIR scale for methodological quality in dental therapy research11 cited
  • 2022Recommendations for Writing Clinical Research Manuscripts: From Monofocal to Multifocal Intraocular Lenses10 cited
  • 2024Enhancing the quality of reporting of orthodontic clinical research8 cited
  • 2023Author instructions in biomedical journals infrequently address systematic review reporting and methodology: a cross-sectional study6 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work