References

• 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
• 2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration17,627 cited
• 2011QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies14,163 cited
• 2003Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV)9,113 cited
• 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
• 2003The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews3,593 cited
• 2005Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews3,362 cited
• 2005The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed2,906 cited
• 2004Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy800 cited
• 2008An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy showed hierarchical models are necessary217 cited
• 2014Reporting standards for studies of diagnostic test accuracy in dementia196 cited
• 2005Challenges in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Technologies176 cited
• 2012Bivariate meta-analysis of predictive values of diagnostic tests can be an alternative to bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity