THE DRAW‐A‐MAN TEST: A STUDY OF SCORING METHODS, VALIDITY AND NORMS WITH ENGLISH CHILDREN AT FIVE AND ELEVEN YEARS

C. J. Phillips · Beryl Smith · Anne Broadhurst

6 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychological Testing and Assessment Cognitive Abilities and Testing Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Abstract

SUMMARY The performance of samples of English children at five and eleven years on the Draw‐a‐Man test is assessed by the scoring methods of Goodenough and Harris. Proposals are made for improving definitions of some scoring instructions. Inters‐corer reliabilities are reported. Average scores of the samples are compared to American norms. Relationships between scores on this test and other cognitive and educational tests arc interpreted.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 6 citations exist upstream.

References

1928Measurement of Intelligence by Drawings 1964Children's Drawings as Measures of Intellectual Maturity 1960DEVELOPMENT IN PRESCHOOL CHILDREN OF THE ABILITY TO COPY FORMS1 1967An evaluation of the Harris revision of the Goodenough Draw-A-Man Test 1963THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE GOODENOUGH DRAW‐A‐MAN TEST 1964The goodenough draw-a-man test: Long term reliability and validity 1967THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE GOODENOUGH‐HARRIS DRAWING TEST 1968A VALIDATION OF THE HARRIS‐GOODENOUGH TEST

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.