SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How to assess a survey report: a guide for readers and peer reviewers
16 references·2 citing·33 second hop
How to assess a survey report: a guide for readers and peer reviewers (2015)How to assess a survey report: a guide fo…Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (2015)Health Measurement Scales: A …The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2008)The Strengthening the Reporti…Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Assessing Risk of Bias in Inc…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Strengthening the Reporting o…Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Strengthening the Reporting o…Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) (2004)Improving the Quality of Web …Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Measuring inconsistency in me…Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research (2003)Good practice in the conduct …Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals (1997)Response rates to mail survey…Survey research methods (1990)Survey research methodsHealth Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Health Measurement Scales: A …Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. (1982)Mail and Telephone Surveys: T…Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. (1979)Mail and Telephone Surveys: T…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…The barriers, facilitators and association of vaccine certificates on COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a scoping review (2023)The barriers, facilitators an…Correlation Between Financial Toxicity, Quality of Life, and Patient Satisfaction in an Insured Population of Breast Cancer Surgical Patients: A Single-Institution Retrospective Study (2020)Correlation Between Financial…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis (2001)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians (2008)Knowledge and Perceptions of COVID-19 Among Health Care Workers: Cross-Sectional Study (2020)A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) (2021)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires (2006)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review (1985)Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. (2001)Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys (2006)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement (2015)Assessing the quality of studies in meta-analyses: Advantages and limitations of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (2017)Physical, psychological and occupational consequences of job burnout: A systematic review of prospective studies (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
  • 2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses63,086 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies22,917 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies17,756 cited
  • 2008The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies17,743 cited
  • 1989Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use9,594 cited
  • 2007Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration8,588 cited
  • 1982Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method.6,852 cited
  • 2004Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES)6,450 cited
  • 1979Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method.5,023 cited
  • 2007Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration3,542 cited
  • 2008Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies3,395 cited
  • 1990Survey research methods2,468 cited
  • 2015Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2,336 cited
  • 2003Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research2,160 cited
  • 1997Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals2,108 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2020Correlation Between Financial Toxicity, Quality of Life, and Patient Satisfaction in an Insured Population of Breast Cancer Surgical Patients: A Single-Institution Retrospective Study61 cited
    • 2023The barriers, facilitators and association of vaccine certificates on COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a scoping review10 cited