SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Opportunities and challenges for improving the quality of reporting clinical research: CONSORT and beyond
16 references·16 citing·31 second hopsampled
Opportunities and challenges for improving the quality of reporting clinical research: CONSORT and beyond (2004)Opportunities and challenges for improvin…Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate…Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate…The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration (2003)The STARD statement for repor…The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration (2003)The STARD Statement for Repor…How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)How important are comprehensi…Value of Flow Diagrams in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials (2001)Value of Flow Diagrams in Rep…Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials (2001)Use of the CONSORT Statement …The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials: an evaluation of 7 medical areas. (2001)Completeness of safety report…Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Meta-analysis of Observationa…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1998)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. D…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of BiasReporting quality of N-of-1 trials published between 1985 and 2013: a systematic review (2016)Reporting quality of N-of-1 t…Application of the STROBE statement to the hypospadias literature: Report of the international pediatric urology task force on hypospadias (2016)Application of the STROBE sta…Methodological Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials in 3 Leading Diabetes Journals From 2011 to 2013 Following CONSORT Statement (2015)Methodological Reporting Qual…Trends in Worldwide Volume and Methodological Quality of Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials (2013)Trends in Worldwide Volume an…Developing a reporting guideline for social and psychological intervention trials (2013)Developing a reporting guidel…Developing a Reporting Guideline for Social and Psychological Intervention Trials (2013)Developing a Reporting Guidel…Developing a Reporting Guideline for Social and Psychological Intervention Trials (2013)Developing a Reporting Guidel…Developing a reporting guideline for social and psychological intervention trials (2013)Developing a reporting guidel…The quality of reporting of RCTs used within a postoperative pain management meta-analysis, using the CONSORT statement (2012)The quality of reporting of R…Improvement in the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials Among General Anesthesiology Journals 2000 to 2006: A 6-Year Follow-Up (2009)Improvement in the Quality of…Editorial policy and the reporting of randomized controlled trials: a survey of instructions for authors and assessment of trial reports in Indian medical journals (2004-05). (2008)Editorial policy and the repo…Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials from two leading cancer journals using the CONSORT statement (2008)Assessing the quality of rand…Review: Benzodiazepines in generalized anxiety disorder: heterogeneity of outcomes based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials (2007)Review: Benzodiazepines in ge…Reporting Random Controlled Trials of Herbal Medicines (2006)Reporting Random Controlled T…Evaluating the Quality of Reporting Occupational Therapy Randomized Controlled Trials by Expanding the CONSORT Criteria (2006)Evaluating the Quality of Rep…Ensayos clínicos aleatorizados (CONSORT) (2005)Ensayos clínicos aleatorizado…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement (2015)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)A Systematic Review of Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Violence (2012)Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials (2012)THE EFFECT OF ENGLISH-LANGUAGE RESTRICTION ON SYSTEMATIC REVIEW-BASED META-ANALYSES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES (2012)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (Chinese edition) (2009)Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed (2011)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
  • 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
  • 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative3,215 cited
  • 2003The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration1,214 cited
  • 2003How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study1,181 cited
  • 2003The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration1,124 cited
  • 2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
  • 2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

703 cited
  • 2001Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials: an evaluation of 7 medical areas.564 cited
  • 2001Value of Flow Diagrams in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials316 cited
  • 1998Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement177 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2007Review: Benzodiazepines in generalized anxiety disorder: heterogeneity of outcomes based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials103 cited
    • 2013Developing a reporting guideline for social and psychological intervention trials80 cited
    • 2016Reporting quality of N-of-1 trials published between 1985 and 2013: a systematic review66 cited
    • 2013Trends in Worldwide Volume and Methodological Quality of Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials64 cited
    • 2005Ensayos clínicos aleatorizados (CONSORT)40 cited
    • 2013Developing a reporting guideline for social and psychological intervention trials38 cited
    • 2006Evaluating the Quality of Reporting Occupational Therapy Randomized Controlled Trials by Expanding the CONSORT Criteria33 cited
    • 2006Reporting Random Controlled Trials of Herbal Medicines31 cited
    • 2009Improvement in the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials Among General Anesthesiology Journals 2000 to 2006: A 6-Year Follow-Up28 cited
    • 2013Developing a Reporting Guideline for Social and Psychological Intervention Trials27 cited
    • 2015Methodological Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials in 3 Leading Diabetes Journals From 2011 to 2013 Following CONSORT Statement26 cited
    • 2008Editorial policy and the reporting of randomized controlled trials: a survey of instructions for authors and assessment of trial reports in Indian medical journals (2004-05).24 cited
    • 2012The quality of reporting of RCTs used within a postoperative pain management meta-analysis, using the CONSORT statement23 cited
    • 2013Developing a Reporting Guideline for Social and Psychological Intervention Trials20 cited
    • 2016Application of the STROBE statement to the hypospadias literature: Report of the international pediatric urology task force on hypospadias19 cited
    • 2008Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials from two leading cancer journals using the CONSORT statement17 cited