Peer Review: Recent Experience and Future Directions

Mark Ware

94 citations0/0 files storedNew Review of Information Networking

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Writing and Publishing Academic Publishing and Open Access

Abstract

What are the challenges and opportunities facing peer review in a networked world? We review the state of journal peer review at the end of 2010, beset by ever-increasing volumes of journal articles demanding to be reviewed in ever-shorter times and by a range of criticisms of its effectiveness and value. We consider the opportunities for improvement and review alternative approaches including open and post-publication review and the possible use of article-level metrics as a replacement. We conclude that far from being in crisis, peer review has remains widely supported and diversely innovative.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 94 citations exist upstream.

References

2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias 2006Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals 1998Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports 2007Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies 2010A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants 2010Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial 2006Differences in Review Quality and Recommendations for Publication Between Peer Reviewers Suggested by Authors or by Editors

Cited by

2012Open Evaluation: A Vision for Entirely Transparent Post-Publication Peer Review and Rating for Science 2017Can editors save peer review from peer reviewers?2013Collaborative Peer-Supported Review of Teaching 2017Peer review: The experience and views of early career researchers 2017“Let the community decide”? The vision and reality of soundness-only peer review in open-access mega-journals

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.