Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Do ECJ judges all speak with the same voice? Evidence of divergent preferences from the judgments of chambers

13 references·16 citing·39 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2001Mapping Policy Preferences1,276 cited
2004The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data1,153 cited
2002Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–19991,145 cited
1981Lawyers, Judges, and the Making of a Transnational Constitution952 cited
1997Political Parties in the European Union842 cited
2002Establishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe699 cited
1986On Law and Policy in the European Court of Justice538 cited
1995The politics of legal integration in the European Union508 cited
1998Constructing a Supranational Constitution: Dispute Resolution and Governance in the European Community485 cited
1994A Quiet Revolution479 cited
1999Dimensions and alignments in European Union politics: Cognitive constraints and partisan responses476 cited
2008Judicial Behavior under Political Constraints: Evidence from the European Court of Justice388 cited
2011The Political Foundations of Judicial Independence in the European Union188 cited

Cited by

2013‘If you can't beat me, join me!’ How the Commission pushed and pulled member states into legislating defence procurement108 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2011Who cares about nationality? The path-dependent case law of the ECJ from goods to citizens95 cited

2020Supranationalism, constrained? Locating the Court of Justice on the EU integration dimension72 cited

2011Perpetual momentum: directed and unconstrained?68 cited

2011Introduction – the European Court of Justice and legal integration: perpetual momentum?68 cited

2017The Politics of Citations at the ECJ—Policy Preferences of E.U. Member State Governments and the Citation Behavior of Judges at the European Court of Justice62 cited

2019Demanding Rights57 cited

2021National Courts and Preliminary References to the Court of Justice56 cited

2015Judicial Disagreement need not be Political: Dissent on the Estonian Supreme Court35 cited

2020Building legitimacy: strategic case allocations in the Court of Justice of the European Union33 cited

2023The CJEU Database Platform: Decisions and Decision-Makers29 cited

2019Split Vision: Multidimensionality in the European Union's Legal Policy Space29 cited

2017International Courts: A Theoretical Assessment28 cited

2018Are Advocates General Political? An Empirical Analysis of the Voting Behavior of the Advocates General at the European Court of Justice22 cited

2020Judicial ideology in economic cases: Evidence from the General Court of the European Union18 cited

2021How the Chamber System at the CJEU Undermines the Consistency of the Court’s Application of EU Law18 cited