SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The international EQUATOR network: enhancing the quality and transparency of health care research
0 references·16 citing·42 second hop
The international EQUATOR network: enhancing the quality and transparency of health care research (2011)The international EQUATOR network: enhanc…Promoting the quality and transparency of health research in China (2022)Promoting the quality and tra…A meta-review demonstrates improved reporting quality of qualitative reviews following the publication of COREQ- and ENTREQ-checklists, regardless of modest uptake (2021)A meta-review demonstrates im…Mapping the nomenclature, methodology, and reporting of studies that review methods: a pilot methodological review (2020)Mapping the nomenclature, met…High impact nutrition and dietetics journals’ use of publication procedures to increase research transparency (2020)High impact nutrition and die…Assessing the reporting quality of physical activity programs in randomized controlled trials for the management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis using three standardized assessment tools (2020)Assessing the reporting quali…Guidance for reporting outcomes in clinical trials: scoping review protocol (2019)Guidance for reporting outcom…Voices from low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol of primary healthcare interventions within public health systems addressing intimate partner violence against women (2018)Voices from low-income and mi…Reporting quality of music intervention research in healthcare: A systematic review (2018)Reporting quality of music in…Mental health training programmes for non-mental health trained professionals coming into contact with people with mental ill health: a systematic review of effectiveness (2017)Mental health training progra…A scoping review protocol on social participation of indigenous elders, intergenerational solidarity and their influence on individual and community wellness (2017)A scoping review protocol on …A guide to publishing scientific research in the health sciences (2017)A guide to publishing scienti…Surveys on Reporting Guideline Usage in Dental Journals (2016)Surveys on Reporting Guidelin…How have research questions and methods used in clinical trials published in Clinical Rehabilitation changed over the last 30 years? (2016)How have research questions a…Das RECORD-Statement zum Berichten von Beobachtungsstudien, die routinemäßig gesammelte Gesundheitsdaten verwenden (2016)Das RECORD-Statement zum Beri…‘Spin’ in reports of clinical research (2016)‘Spin’ in reports of clinical…Guidelines for randomized clinical trial protocol content: a systematic review (2012)Guidelines for randomized cli…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) (2014)Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal (2016)SPIRIT extension and elaboration for n-of-1 trials: SPENT 2019 checklist (2020)Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network (2010)Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers (2012)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)A survey of retracted articles in dentistry (2017)A cross-sectional bibliometric study showed suboptimal journal endorsement rates of STROBE and its extensions (2018)Systematic reviews in dentistry: Current status, epidemiological and reporting characteristics (2019)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial (2014)Flexibilization of Science, Cognitive Biases, and the COVID-19 Pandemic (2020)“Spin” in Plastic Surgery Randomized Controlled Trials with Statistically Nonsignificant Primary Outcomes: A Systematic Review (2022)Assessing “Spin” in Urology Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Primary Outcomes (2022)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)Effectiveness of Mental Health First Aid: a meta-analysis (2019)Psychosocial risk and protective factors associated with burnout in police officers: A systematic review (2023)Co-development of a training programme on disability for healthcare workers in Uganda (2024)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Critical Appraisal Tools and Reporting Guidelines (2021)Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement (2004)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Effects of progressive muscle relaxation combined with music on stress, fatigue, and coping styles among intensive care nurses (2019)Effects of music participation for mild cognitive impairment and dementia: A systematic review and meta‐analysis (2021)Mental health and music engagement: review, framework, and guidelines for future studies (2021)Fragilidades no processo de trabalho na Atenção à Saúde à Mulher em situação de violência sexual (2020)PROTOCOL: Strengthening women's empowerment and gender equality in fragile contexts towards peaceful and inclusive societies: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2021)Panorama of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women in Brazil and its Association With Self-Perception of Health: Findings From a National Representative Survey (2023)The Structure of Research Questions in Randomized Controlled Trials in the Rehabilitation Field (2020)Using systems perspectives in evidence synthesis: A methodological mapping review (2022)Towards a Checklist for Improving Action Research Quality in Healthcare Contexts (2023)Digital learning in nursing education: lessons from the COVID-19 lockdown (2024)How do you solve a problem like COREQ? A critique of Tong et al.’s (2007) Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2018Reporting quality of music intervention research in healthcare: A systematic review152 cited
  • 2016Das RECORD-Statement zum Berichten von Beobachtungsstudien, die routinemäßig gesammelte Gesundheitsdaten verwenden92 cited
  • 2012Guidelines for randomized clinical trial protocol content: a systematic review81 cited
  • 2017Mental health training programmes for non-mental health trained professionals coming into contact with people with mental ill health: a systematic review of effectiveness81 cited
  • 2016Surveys on Reporting Guideline Usage in Dental Journals53 cited
  • 2021A meta-review demonstrates improved reporting quality of qualitative reviews following the publication of COREQ- and ENTREQ-checklists, regardless of modest uptake52 cited
  • 2018Voices from low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol of primary healthcare interventions within public health systems addressing intimate partner violence against women25 cited
  • 2020Mapping the nomenclature, methodology, and reporting of studies that review methods: a pilot methodological review22 cited
  • 2016‘Spin’ in reports of clinical research21 cited
  • 2017A guide to publishing scientific research in the health sciences19 cited
  • 2020Assessing the reporting quality of physical activity programs in randomized controlled trials for the management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis using three standardized assessment tools16 cited
  • 2016How have research questions and methods used in clinical trials published in Clinical Rehabilitation changed over the last 30 years?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

15 cited
  • 2019Guidance for reporting outcomes in clinical trials: scoping review protocol14 cited
  • 2020High impact nutrition and dietetics journals’ use of publication procedures to increase research transparency11 cited
  • 2017A scoping review protocol on social participation of indigenous elders, intergenerational solidarity and their influence on individual and community wellness11 cited
  • 2022Promoting the quality and transparency of health research in China9 cited