SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematic review of communication partner training in aphasia: Methodological quality
11 references·2 citing·43 second hop
Systematic review of communication partner training in aphasia: Methodological quality (2013)Systematic review of communication partne…Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs andn-of-1 trials: Introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Scale (2008)Rating the methodological qua…Not all systematic reviews are created equal: Considerations for appraisal (2007)Not all systematic reviews ar…Evaluating Single-Subject Treatment Research: Lessons Learned from the Aphasia Literature (2006)Evaluating Single-Subject Tre…The PEDro scale provides a more comprehensive measure of methodological quality than the Jadad Scale in stroke rehabilitation literature (2005)The PEDro scale provides a mo…Reliability of the PEDro Scale for Rating Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials (2003)Reliability of the PEDro Scal…Evidence for physiotherapy practice: A survey of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) (2002)Evidence for physiotherapy pr…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Rationale and Standards for the Systematic Review of Qualitative Literature in Health Services Research (1998)Rationale and Standards for t…PEDro: A Database of Randomised Controlled Trials in Physiotherapy (1998)PEDro: A Database of Randomis…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)A Coefficient of Agreement fo…A unified framework for bias assessment in clinical research (2019)A unified framework for bias …Reading comprehension treatment in aphasia: a systematic review (2018)Reading comprehension treatme…Sustained Attention in Children With Primary Language Impairment: A Meta-Analysis (2011)PND at 25 (2012)A systematic literature review of the experiences and supports of students with autism spectrum disorder in post-secondary education (2017)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials (1998)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Estimates of Quality and Reliability With the Physiotherapy Evidence-Based Database Scale to Assess the Methodology of Randomized Controlled Trials of Pharmacological and Nonpharmacological Interventions (2006)INVITED COMMENTARY: Rating the Quality of Trials in Systematic Reviews of Physical Therapy Interventions (2010)The Effectiveness of Music in Pediatric Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials (2010)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1994)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Revision of a method quality rating scale for single-case experimental designs andn-of-1 trials: The 15-item Risk of Bias inN-of-1 Trials (RoBiNT) Scale (2013)Psychological Determinants of Whole-Body Endurance Performance (2015)The Delphi List (1998)A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools (2004)Scales to Assess the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review (2007)Clinimetrics: Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) Scale (2019)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Best practice for motor imagery: a systematic literature review on motor imagery training elements in five different disciplines (2011)Single-case experimental designs: A systematic review of published research and current standards. (2012)Single-case experimental designs to assess intervention effectiveness in rehabilitation: A practical guide (2017)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study (2009)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays (1974)Handbook of Qualitative Research. (1995)Qualitative Research: Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research (1995)Critically appraising qualitative research (2008)Evaluative Criteria for Qualitative Research in Health Care: Controversies and Recommendations (2008)Rigour in qualitative case-study research (2013)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
  • 1960A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales42,335 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 2003Reliability of the PEDro Scale for Rating Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials4,799 cited
  • 1998Rationale and Standards for the Systematic Review of Qualitative Literature in Health Services Research988 cited
  • 2002Evidence for physiotherapy practice: A survey of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro)910 cited
  • 2006Evaluating Single-Subject Treatment Research: Lessons Learned from the Aphasia Literature548 cited
  • 2008Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs andn-of-1 trials: Introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Scale362 cited
  • 2005The PEDro scale provides a more comprehensive measure of methodological quality than the Jadad Scale in stroke rehabilitation literature227 cited
  • 2007Not all systematic reviews are created equal: Considerations for appraisal223 cited
  • 1998PEDro: A Database of Randomised Controlled Trials in Physiotherapy90 cited

Cited by

  • 2018Reading comprehension treatment in aphasia: a systematic review42 cited
  • 2019A unified framework for bias assessment in clinical research41 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work