Construction Change: Likelihood, Severity, and Impact on Productivity

William Ibbs

113 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Construction Project Management and Performance BIM and Construction Integration Value Engineering and Management

Abstract

Change on construction projects is a regular occurrence and impedes project success for both the owner and the contractor. Many papers have been written about change, but few document its prevalence, severity, and impact on labor productivity in a reliable, quantitative way. The purpose of this paper is to help project owners, contractors, and other parties understand and benchmark their projects against a large set of construction projects. Data from two independent research studies are analyzed to quantify the impact of change on project cost, schedule, and productivity. The result is a set of curves and reference points that contrast the amount and likelihood of change with the amount and nature of its impact. One major finding of this study is that the ratio of final project costs to estimated project costs is substantially higher than conventionally thought. Previous reports hold that two-thirds of all projects should have fewer than 15% change. The equivalent number found in this study was 19%. Approximately 40% of all projects in this study experienced more than 10% change. Many industry observers believe that cumulative impact is a rare condition and is likely to occur when change exceeds 10%. On the basis of these findings, cumulative impact occurs more frequently than generally thought. Two other findings concern the quantitative rates at which productivity and the predictability of productivity deteriorate with increasing amounts of change. Productivity exceeded planned rates on 60% of the projects when change was limited to 5%, but it never reached planned rates once change exceeded 20%. Minimizing change is thus important for realizing good productivity performance. Change averaged 8% on these projects. Findings presented in this paper can be used to forecast prospectively the impacts that change has on cost, schedule, and productivity. They can also help the parties retroactively assess the impact of change when looking for guidance to settle disputes.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 113 citations exist upstream.

References

1994Construction Claims and Disputes: Causes and Cost/Time Overruns 1995Quantitative Effects of Construction Changes on Labor Productivity 1999Impact of Change Orders on Labor Efficiency for Electrical Construction 1981Understanding cost growth and performance shortfalls in pioneer process plants 1997Quantitative Impacts of Project Change: Size Issues 1985Construction Claims: Frequency and Severity

Cited by

2019Construction labour productivity: review of factors identified 2015Analysis of Factors Affecting Design Changes in Construction Project with Partial Least Square (PLS)2020Analysis of cost comparison and effects of change orders during construction: Study of a mass timber and a concrete building project 2014Applying total interpretive structural modeling to study factors affecting construction labour productivity 2020Quantitative Comparison of Project Performance between Project Delivery Systems 2018Contract Administration Guidelines for Public Infrastructure Projects in the United States and Saudi Arabia: Comparative Analysis Approach 2018

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.