Childhood Under Siege: Lois Lowry's Number the Stars and The Giver

Abstract

In Western society we tend to think of childhood as a discrete stage of life, separate and different from adulthood. However, historians tell us that the way we view childhood is not the way other cultures in other times and places have viewed it. In his classic work Centuries of Childhood, Philippe Ariés examines childhood in seventeenth-century France, and he makes the rather astonishing claim that in medieval society, childhood did not exist; instead, children were considered to be small adults and were depicted as such in the art of the period (33-34, 128). However, in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries, this view began to change. During this time, two views of childhood emerged, both of which emphasized the child as being different from the adult. One view considered children to be sweet and simple and thus a source of amusement for adults (129). The other view considered children to be "fragile creatures of God who needed to be both safeguarded and reformed" (133). In the years since the publication of Centuries of Childhood, Ariés's thesis has been largely discredited by medieval and early modern scholars as a misreading of late medieval culture; what Ariés took to be the lack of a concept of childhood was actually a view of childhood radically different from ours (Adams 2-3). Nevertheless, Ariés's contribution to childhood studies lies not so much in the validity of his thesis as in his recognition of childhood as socially constructed and constantly reconstructed (Adams 2; Jenkins 16).

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 15 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.