SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
What Are the Levels of Evidence on Which We Base Decisions for Surgical Management of Lower Extremity Bone Tumors?
16 references·0 citing·40 second hop
What Are the Levels of Evidence on Which We Base Decisions for Surgical Management of Lower Extremity Bone Tumors? (2013)What Are the Levels of Evidence on Which …Introducing levels of evidence to the journal (2011)Introducing levels of evidenc…Levels of Evidence in Research Published in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume) Over the Last Thirty Years (2009)Levels of Evidence in Researc…Editorial: Standards of Reporting: The CONSORT, QUORUM, and STROBE Guidelines (2009)Editorial: Standards of Repor…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…The Quality of Reporting of Orthopaedic Randomized Trials with Use of a Checklist for Nonpharmacological Therapies (2007)The Quality of Reporting of O…Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Strengthening the Reporting o…Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) (2007)Strengthening the Reporting o…Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials? (2006)Does a "Level I Evidence" rat…Quality of Reporting of Observational Longitudinal Research (2005)Quality of Reporting of Obser…LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IN ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNALS (2005)LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IN ORTHOPAE…INTRODUCING LEVELS OF EVIDENCE TO THE JOURNAL (2003)INTRODUCING LEVELS OF EVIDENC…THE QUALITY OF REPORTING OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY FROM 1988 THROUGH 2000 (2002)THE QUALITY OF REPORTING OF R…APPLICATION OF THE CONSOLIDATED STANDARDS OF REPORTING TRIALS (CONSORT) IN THE FRACTURE CARE LITERATURE (2002)APPLICATION OF THE CONSOLIDAT…Meta-Analyses in Orthopaedic Surgery (2001)Meta-Analyses in Orthopaedic …Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (2000)Improving the quality of repo…Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis (1992)Incorporating variations in t…A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN THE REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC LITERATURE1 (1987)Assessing the Quality of Randomized Trials (1999)Bias in Clinical Intervention Research (2006)A meta-analysis of the impact of short-term sleep deprivation on cognitive variables. (2010)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Grey Literature in Meta-Analyses (2003)Emotional intelligence in medicine: a systematic review through the context of the ACGME competencies (2010)Motivation Interventions in Education (2015)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Journal impact factor: a brief review. (1999)Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? (2011)Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability (2018)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review (2014)Health literacy and vaccination: A systematic review (2017)Mental disorders as risk factors for suicidal behavior in young people: A meta-analysis and systematic review of longitudinal studies (2018)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The Proof and Measurement of Association between Two Things (1904)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement (2007)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement (2015)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement (2015)How to Write a Systematic Review (2013)How Effective is Cultural Competence Training of Healthcare Providers on Improving Patient Satisfaction of Minority Groups? A Systematic Review of Literature (2016)The Reporting of Randomized Clinical Trials Using a Surgical Intervention Is in Need of Immediate Improvement (2006)The reporting quality of randomised controlled trials in surgery: A systematic review (2007)The Fragility of Statistically Significant Findings From Randomized Trials in Sports Surgery: A Systematic Survey (2016)Have Levels of Evidence Improved the Quality of Orthopaedic Research? (2013)Fifty top-cited classic papers in orthopedic elbow surgery: A bibliometric analysis (2015)Loss to follow-up in orthopaedic clinical trials: a systematic review (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies22,917 cited
  • 2007Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration8,588 cited
  • 2007Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE)2,774 cited
  • 2003INTRODUCING LEVELS OF EVIDENCE TO THE JOURNAL1,298 cited
  • 1992Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis640 cited
  • 2000Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement416 cited
  • 2011Introducing levels of evidence to the journal364 cited
  • 2005Quality of Reporting of Observational Longitudinal Research363 cited
  • 2005LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IN ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNALS359 cited
  • 2002THE QUALITY OF REPORTING OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY FROM 1988 THROUGH 2000243 cited
  • 2001Meta-Analyses in Orthopaedic Surgery190 cited
  • 2009Levels of Evidence in Research Published in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume) Over the Last Thirty Years121 cited
  • 2006Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials?99 cited
  • 2007The Quality of Reporting of Orthopaedic Randomized Trials with Use of a Checklist for Nonpharmacological Therapies

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

85 cited
  • 2009Editorial: Standards of Reporting: The CONSORT, QUORUM, and STROBE Guidelines75 cited
  • 2002APPLICATION OF THE CONSOLIDATED STANDARDS OF REPORTING TRIALS (CONSORT) IN THE FRACTURE CARE LITERATURE56 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.