Pilot Selection Batteries: Shortcomings and Perspectives

Diane L. Damos

59 citations0/0 files storedInternational Journal of Aviation Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Employer Branding and e-HRM Psychological Testing and Assessment Cognitive Abilities and Testing

Abstract

This article presents a critical examination of pilot selection batteries. The first part of the article focuses on two problems. First, the vast majority of pilot selection batteries predict training performance rather than operational performance; second, the batteries have low correlations between the predictors and the criterion. The second part of the article examines why these two problems occur. Last, a number of suggestions for improving the predictive validity of the selection batteries are offered.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 59 citations exist upstream.

References

1983The Cost of Dichotomization 1982A Selective Attention Test as a Predictor of Success in Flight Training 1959The psychologist as an instrument of prediction.1977Aviator Selection 1919-1977.

Cited by

1997Cognition and flight performance in older pilots.2010Knowing what to do and doing it: Differences in self-assessed tactical skills of regional, sub-elite, and elite youth field hockey players

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.