SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Duchenne muscular dystrophy: relevant paper was not included
5 references·2 citing·29 second hop
Duchenne muscular dystrophy: relevant paper was not included (2001)Duchenne muscular dystrophy: relevant pap…The Campbell Collaboration (2017)The Campbell CollaborationSystematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-analysis in Context. (2002)Systematic Reviews in Health …Well-Meaning Programs Can Have Harmful Effects! Lessons from Experiments of Programs Such as Scared Straight (2000)Well-Meaning Programs Can Hav…Review of the usefulness of contacting other experts when conducting a literature search for systematic reviews (1998)Review of the usefulness of c…Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-…Revealing the faults in medical journals (2009)Revealing the faults in medic…Fecal Incontinence: The Quality of Reported Randomized, Controlled Trials in the Last Ten Years (2007)Fecal Incontinence: The Quali…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn't, What's Promising (1998)Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn't, What's Promising (1998)Improved street lighting and crime prevention (2002)Effects of Closed-Circuit Television on Crime (2003)Effects Of Improved Street Lighting On Crime: A Systematic Review (2004)The British Journal of Criminology (2017)Searching the Literature (1994)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)A systematic review of the literature exploring the role of primary care in genetic services (1999)Publication Bias: A Brief Review for Clinicians (2000)Decision Making in Health and Medicine: Integrating Evidence and Values (2001)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Assessing the outcome of compulsory psychiatric treatment in the community: epidemiological study in Western Australia (2002)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Randomized Controlled Trials: How Can We Know “What Works”? (2017)A scoping review of engineering education systematic reviews (2023)El Cuestionario de Salud SF-36 español: una década de experiencia y nuevos desarrollos (2005)Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta‐analytical methods with rare events (2006)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)Student Ratings of Instruction and Student Achievement: A Meta-analysis of Multisection Validity Studies (1981)Best evidence synthesis: An intelligent alternative to meta-analysis (1995)One Hundred Years of Social Psychology Quantitatively Described (2003)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2002Systematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-analysis in Context.1,363 cited
  • 1976Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research958 cited
  • 1998Review of the usefulness of contacting other experts when conducting a literature search for systematic reviews186 cited
  • 2000Well-Meaning Programs Can Have Harmful Effects! Lessons from Experiments of Programs Such as Scared Straight181 cited
  • 2017The Campbell Collaboration64 cited

Cited by

  • 2007Fecal Incontinence: The Quality of Reported Randomized, Controlled Trials in the Last Ten Years11 cited
  • 2009Revealing the faults in medical journals8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work