The Syntactic Basis of Arabic Word Classification

Abstract

A MONG the most famous tenets of Arabic grammar is the division I of words into verbs, nouns and particles. What is perhaps given less attention is the fact that the Arabic grammarians defined each of these according to criteria from all levels of linguistic analysisphonological, morphological, syntactic and semantic/pragmatic. Of these perhaps the two most important are the morphological and syntactic. In this paper I will show the importance of syntactic analysis in the definition of the three basic word classes. That syntactic criteria are important can be seen if one examines Ibn Malik's (in his Alfiyya) definitions of nouns, verbs and particles (as discussed briefly in Weiss 1976). Nouns have the genitive case, nunation (tanwin), the definite article, the vocative and occur as subjects. Verbs are distinguished by the suffixes -t and -i (feminine) and the energetic nun, while particles are what are left over. One point that is apparent on this list is that many of the criteria admit of significant exceptions. (1) Nouns: genitive case and nunation. Any noun which is uninflected (gayr mutamakkin; mabni) such as demonstratives, and relative, personal, and interrogative pronouns, lack all case inflection and nunation (cf. 2.3). (2) Nouns: definite article. Proper names, demonstratives and pronouns all lack the definite article. (3) Verbs: special classes of verbs, like the verbs of exclamation, the nominal verbs ('asmd' al-'afd') and verbs such as bi'sa ) (Basran viewpoint) all lack (non-feminine) -t and the energetic

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 22 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.