Article1974

Prognosis of depression and the endogenous-neurotic distinction

Eugene S. Paykel · Gerald L. Klerman · Brigitte A. Prusoff

71 citations0/0 files storedPsychological Medicine

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes Treatment of Major Depression Psychological Treatments and Disorders

Abstract

SYNOPSIS Depressed patients were followed-up after 10 months, and factor scores reflecting respectively general severity, the endogenous-neurotic distinction, and an admixture of anxiety versus depression were used as predictors. The main prognostic relationships were with the endogenous-neurotic distinction and provided validating evidence for it. Endogenous depressives showed generally better prognoses. Individual rating variables used to derive the factors showed little relationship to outcome and prediction appeared to derive from a summation of elements relevant to the endogenous-neurotic distinction across many variables.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 71 citations exist upstream.

References

1960A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION 1967The social readjustment rating scale 1960A Rating Scale for Depression 1968The Nosology of Depression: The Endogenous-Reactive Concept 1968Eysenck Personality Inventory Scores of Patients with Depressive Illnesses 1972The Structured and Scaled Interview to Assess Maladjustment (SSIAM)1970Treatment Setting and Clinical Depression 1971DIMENSIONS OF SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT IN DEPRESSED WOMEN

Cited by

1994Major Depressive Disorder 1986Effectiveness of two psychological treatments for inpatients with severe and chronic depressions

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.