SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Boldt: the great pretender
0 references·13 citing·40 second hop
Boldt: the great pretender (2013)Boldt: the great pretenderHow artificial intelligence will affect the future of medical publishing (2023)How artificial intelligence w…Investigating the veracity of a sample of divergent published trial data in spinal pain (2022)Investigating the veracity of…Team size and retracted citations reveal the patterns of retractions from 1981 to 2020 (2021)Team size and retracted citat…Fraud in scientific publications in the European Union. An analysis through their retractions. (2021)Fraud in scientific publicati…Fraud and retraction in perioperative medicine publications: what we learned and what can be implemented to prevent future recurrence (2021)Fraud and retraction in perio…A Systematic Review of Retractions in the Field of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia (2021)A Systematic Review of Retrac…Assessing the impact of retraction on the citation of randomized controlled trial reports: an interrupted time-series analysis (2018)Assessing the impact of retra…An analysis of retractions of papers authored by Scott Reuben, Joachim Boldt and Yoshitaka Fujii (2018)An analysis of retractions of…A systematic review of retracted publications in emergency medicine (2017)A systematic review of retrac…What Anaesthesia is doing to combat scientific misconduct and investigate data fabrication and falsification (2016)What Anaesthesia is doing to …Evidence for non‐random sampling in randomised, controlled trials by Yuhji Saitoh (2016)Evidence for non‐random sampl…Characteristics of retractions related to faked peer reviews: an overview (2016)Characteristics of retraction…Perpetuation of Retracted Publications Using the Example of the Scott S. Reuben Case: Incidences, Reasons and Possible Improvements (2015)Perpetuation of Retracted Pub…A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature (2012)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Journal Retractions: Some Unique Features of Research Misconduct in China (2018)Plagiarism, Fake Peer-Review, and Duplication: Predominant Reasons Underlying Retractions of Iran-Affiliated Scientific Papers (2020)Scientific misconduct and associated factors: A survey of researchers in three Chinese tertiary hospitals (2020)Extreme between-study homogeneity in meta-analyses could offer useful insights (2006)The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity (2012)An Appraisal of the Carlisle-Stouffer-Fisher Method for Assessing Study Data Integrity and Fraud (2017)Integrity of randomized controlled trials: challenges and solutions (2020)Assessing Research Misconduct in Randomized Controlled Trials (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Post retraction citations among manuscripts reporting a radiology-imaging diagnostic method (2019)The continued citation of retracted publications in dentistry (2020)Retracted publications in pharmacy systematic reviews (2022)Phenomena of Retraction (1998)Data fabrication and other reasons for non‐random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals (2017)Timeliness and content of retraction notices for publications by a single research group (2021)Citation of retracted research: a case-controlled, ten-year follow-up scientometric analysis of Scott S. Reuben’s malpractice (2022)Systematic review of retracted articles in critical care medicine (2022)Relative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences (2005)A quantitative and qualitative open citation analysis of retracted articles in the humanities (2022)A randomized trial alerting authors, with or without coauthors or editors, that research they cited in systematic reviews and guidelines has been retracted (2022)Scientists behaving badly (2005)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Recommendations from the Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: Shaping a Research and Implementation Agenda Project (2021)Predatory publishing practices: what researchers should know before submitting their manuscript (2023)What a massive database of retracted papers reveals about science publishing's ‘death penalty' (2018)Evidence for compromised data integrity in studies of liberal peri‐operative inspired oxygen (2019)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Retracted articles in scientific literature: A bibliometric analysis from 2003 to 2022 using the Web of Science (2024)Citation Contamination by Paper Mill Articles in Systematic Reviews of the Life Sciences (2025)Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)An investigation into the impact and implications of published papers from retracted research: systematic search of affected literature (2019)Reasons for article retraction in anesthesiology: a comprehensive analysis (2019)Citation of retracted publications: A challenging problem (2021)Trials We Cannot Trust: Investigating Their Impact on Systematic Reviews and Clinical Guidelines in Spinal Pain (2023)Assessing the feasibility and impact of clinical trial trustworthiness checks via an application to Cochrane Reviews: Stage 2 of the INSPECT-SR project (2025)INSPECT-SR: a tool for assessing trustworthiness of randomised controlled trials (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2015Perpetuation of Retracted Publications Using the Example of the Scott S. Reuben Case: Incidences, Reasons and Possible Improvements87 cited
  • 2016Evidence for non‐random sampling in randomised, controlled trials by Yuhji Saitoh64 cited
  • 2018An analysis of retractions of papers authored by Scott Reuben, Joachim Boldt and Yoshitaka Fujii50 cited
  • 2017A systematic review of retracted publications in emergency medicine47 cited
  • 2016Characteristics of retractions related to faked peer reviews: an overview46 cited
  • 2021Team size and retracted citations reveal the patterns of retractions from 1981 to 202045 cited
  • 2022Investigating the veracity of a sample of divergent published trial data in spinal pain36 cited
  • 2018Assessing the impact of retraction on the citation of randomized controlled trial reports: an interrupted time-series analysis36 cited
  • 2021Fraud in scientific publications in the European Union. An analysis through their retractions.26 cited
  • 2021Fraud and retraction in perioperative medicine publications: what we learned and what can be implemented to prevent future recurrence20 cited
  • 2016What Anaesthesia is doing to combat scientific misconduct and investigate data fabrication and falsification20 cited
  • 2021A Systematic Review of Retractions in the Field of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia16 cited
  • 2023

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

How artificial intelligence will affect the future of medical publishing
15 cited