Leddick and Bernard review the counseling literature and describe the historical evolution of the practice of supervision from a polarized state to its current trend toward collaboration. The authors analyze several therapy models, and describe direct and indirect supervision activities. This article concludes by calling attention to assumptions in the counseling and supervision literature that have yet to receive the benefit of evaluation and research.
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 97 citations exist upstream.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.