Work2007

Suggestions to Improve Social Work Journal Editorial and Peer-Review Processes: The San Antonio Response to the Miami Statement

Gary W. Holden · Bruce A. Thyer · Judith C. Baer · Jorge Delva · Catherine N. Dulmus · Trina Williams Shanks

19 citations0/0 files storedResearch on Social Work Practice

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Writing and Publishing Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

Interest in and concern about scholarly communications through social work journals seem to have increased recently. One indicator of this concern was the publication of the Miami statement. A Society for Social Work and Research Presidential Task Force was created to continue work on these issues. This article discusses the work of one subcommittee of that task force. This subcommittee developed a set of suggestions pertaining to the processes of submitting social work manuscripts to journals and to the system of editorial review and processing. The authors view these suggestions as expanding on the Miami statement.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 19 citations exist upstream.

References

1999Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations.2011Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association 2006Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies 2014Psychological Reports 1997Strengthening Qualitative Studies and Reports 1978The scientific publication system in social science 1990Replication in behavioral research.2004Quality in Qualitative Evaluation: Issues and Possible Answers

Cited by

2021The Cultivation of Social Work Knowledge: Toward a More Robust System of Peer Review 2015Action Research on Social Work Knowledge Creation and Dissemination from the Global South

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.