Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

FromJus ad BellumtoJus ad Vim: Recalibrating Our Understanding of the Moral Use of Force

13 references·4 citing·38 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1979Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations, by Michael Walzer1,217 cited
1978Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations862 cited
2004Proportionality in the Morality of War414 cited
2010Moral Predators: The Duty to Employ Uninhabited Aerial Vehicles259 cited
2004Just War or Ethical Peace? Moral Discourses of Strategic Violence After 9/11156 cited
2007Morality and Political Violence141 cited
2008Morality and political violence125 cited
2002Risk-transfer Militarism, Small Massacres and the Historic Legitimacy of War118 cited
2011The Implications of Drones on the Just War Tradition111 cited
2011The Ethics of Humanitarian Intervention in Libya98 cited
2008Space, scale and Just War: meeting the challenge of humanitarian intervention and trans-national terrorism70 cited
2012The Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Contemporary Conflict: A Legal and Ethical Analysis59 cited
2008Law and the Long War: The Future of Justice in the Age of Terror58 cited

Cited by

2014Drones and the International Rule of Law78 cited
2014Drones, Risk, and Perpetual Force

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

39 cited

2013Rethinking the Criterion for Assessing Cia-targeted Killings: Drones, Proportionality andJus Ad Vim33 cited

2016On the Redundancy of Jus ad Vim: A Response to Daniel Brunstetter and Megan Braun22 cited