SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Decisions about lumping vs. splitting of the scope of systematic reviews of complex interventions are not well justified: A case study in systematic reviews of health care professional reminders
7 references·3 citing·39 second hop
Decisions about lumping vs. splitting of the scope of systematic reviews of complex interventions are not well justified: A case study in systematic reviews of health care professional reminders (2012)Decisions about lumping vs. splitting of …Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of quality improvement strategies and programmes (2003)Systematic reviews of the eff…A CRITICAL APPRAISAL (2002)A CRITICAL APPRAISALWhy we need a broad perspective on meta-analysis (2000)Why we need a broad perspecti…Evidence Gap Maps in Education Research (2022)Evidence Gap Maps in Educatio…Qualitative evidence syntheses: Assessing the relative contributions of multi‐context and single‐context reviews (2019)Qualitative evidence synthese…Guidance on the use of logic models in health technology assessments of complex interventions (2016)Guidance on the use of logic …The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy in complex mental disorders: update of a meta-analysis (2011)Suicidality in obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD): A systematic review and meta-analysis (2015)Efficacy of group psychotherapy for posttraumatic stress disorder: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (2017)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity (2017)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)Systematic Reviews in Health Care (2001)Trends in the Quality of Care and Racial Disparities in Medicare Managed Care (2005)Mass media interventions for reducing mental health-related stigma (2013)Evidence for effective interventions to reduce mental health-related stigma and discrimination in the medium and long term: Systematic review (2015)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research (2000)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)A worked example of "best fit" framework synthesis: A systematic review of views concerning the taking of some potential chemopreventive agents (2011)Using Qualitative Evidence in Decision Making for Health and Social Interventions: An Approach to Assess Confidence in Findings from Qualitative Evidence Syntheses (GRADE-CERQual) (2015)Searching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a structured methodological review (2016)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Teaching Effectiveness Research in the Past Decade: The Role of Theory and Research Design in Disentangling Meta-Analysis Results (2007)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)Association learning of likes and dislikes: A review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. (2001)Knowledge as a Contingency Variable: Do the Characteristics of Knowledge Predict Organization Structure? (2002)Assessing insomnia in adolescents: Comparison of Insomnia Severity Index, Athens Insomnia Scale and Sleep Quality Index (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement19,577 cited
  • 2007Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews891 cited
  • 2002A CRITICAL APPRAISAL764 cited
  • 2003Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of quality improvement strategies and programmes292 cited
  • 2000Why we need a broad perspective on meta-analysis175 cited

Cited by

  • 2016Guidance on the use of logic models in health technology assessments of complex interventions30 cited
  • 2022Evidence Gap Maps in Education Research19 cited
  • 2019Qualitative evidence syntheses: Assessing the relative contributions of multi‐context and single‐context reviews12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work