Understanding Perceptions of Benefit Following Adversity: How Do Distinct Assessments of Growth Relate to Coping and Adjustment to Stressful Events?

Abstract

Research on stress-related growth typically relies on individuals' retrospective perceptions of growth, not indications of change in personal attributes over time (i.e., measured growth). This longitudinal study sought to: (1) examine the correspondence of perceived and measured growth, (2) elucidate the relations of these forms of growth, coping strategies, and change in adjustment in undergraduates (N = 162), and (3) examine whether current measurement approaches for self-perceived growth adequately capture the theoretical construct of psychological growth. Participants were undergraduates assessed at study entry and at 6 weeks. Perceptions of stress-related growth were not correlated with measured growth. In a path model, measured growth predicted increased positive mood and decreased distress. Perceived growth predicted increased positive mood, mediated by approach-oriented coping, as well as increased distress, partially mediated by coping through denial. These findings have implications for the measurement of stress-related growth and highlight the distinction between perceived and measured growth.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 59 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.