Individual and Partner Love Styles: Implications for the Quality of Romantic Involvements

Gregory D. Morrow · Eddie M. Clark · Karla F. Brock

62 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Social and Personal Relationships

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Attachment and Relationship Dynamics Family Dynamics and Relationships Marriage and Sexual Relationships

Abstract

The goal of this study was to explore the association between the love styles endorsed by respondents and their romantic partners on the one hand, and the quality of their romantic involvements on the other. A sample of 186 couples at a large southern university completed a questionnaire that included a shortened version of Hendrick & Hendrick's (1986) Love Attitudes Scale (LAS) designed to assess six love styles originally proposed by Lee (1973). Both the individual's and partner's scores on the six love scales (Eros, Ludus, Storge, Pragma, Mania, Agape) were then examined as predictors of the structural qualities of the couple's relationship specified by Rusbult's (1980a, 1983) investment model. The results of correlational and multiple regression analyses indicated that the respondent's own love style scores were the best predictors of relationship quality. In particular, the endorsement of Eros and Agape were associated with higher levels of rewards, satisfaction, investments and commitment, lower levels of costs and poor alternative quality. Ludus showed the opposite associations with these same variables. The partner's love styles were also related to a number of relationship characteristics, although less strongly so. In addition, couples showed evidence of matching of love styles (with the exception of Ludus and Mania), and discrepancies in couples' love attitudes were related to negative outcomes for women but not for men. Finally, the associations between several demographic variables (relationship status, age, relationship duration) and respondents' love styles suggest that individuals' love attitudes may be subject to change as a result of time and/or experience. These findings suggest that individuals' beliefs about love have important implications with regard to the relationship outcomes experienced by both themselves and their romantic partners.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 62 citations exist upstream.

References

1982Interpersonal Relations: A Theory of Interdependence 1980Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model 1979Interpersonal relations — a theory of interdependence 1983A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements.1986A theory and method of love.1983A longitudinal test of the investment model: The impact on job satisfaction, job commitment, and turnover of variations in rewards, costs, alternatives, and investments.1988Romantic relationships: Love, satisfaction, and staying together.1988A Biased Overview of the Study of Love

Cited by

2013The Implications of Sexual Narcissism for Sexual and Marital Satisfaction 2012Passion in the romantic sphere: A look at relational outcomes 2008The Gift of Similarity: How Good and Bad Gifts Influence Relationships 2013When low self-esteem encourages behaviors that risk rejection to increase interdependence: The role of relational self-construal.2012Can You Relate? The Importance of Need Satisfaction for the Quality and Progressive Union Formation Process of Intimate Relationships

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.