The accuracy of pre‐tender building cost estimates in Australia

Ajibade A. Aibinu · Thomas Pasco

85 citations0/0 files storedConstruction Management and Economics

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Construction Project Management and Performance BIM and Construction Integration Value Engineering and Management

Abstract

A pre‐tender building cost estimate is an important piece of information when making decisions at the project planning and design stage. The important project characteristics influencing the accuracy of pre‐tender building cost estimates are examined and practical improvement for increasing the accuracy of estimates are considered. A quantitative approach is used to address the research problem. Analysis of data from 56 projects and from a postal questionnaire survey of 102 quantity surveying firms suggests that the accuracy of pre‐tender building cost estimates varies according to project size and principal structural material. When eight identified project characteristics are controlled in a multiple regression analysis, the accuracy of estimates is influenced by project size. The estimates of smaller projects are more biased than the estimates of larger projects. It was discovered that pre‐tender building costs are more often overestimated than are underestimated. Overestimated forecasts are incorrect by a larger amount than underestimated forecasts. Data analysis also revealed that the accuracy of pre‐tender building cost estimates has not improved over time. The majority of the respondents are somewhat dissatisfied with the accuracy of estimates in the industry. Probability estimation and simulation of past estimates, reducing quantity surveying and cost engineering skill turnover, incorporating market sentiments into estimates, early involvement of the quantity surveyor at the brief stage, and proper documentation of experience gained in the estimation of projects should help firms increase the accuracy of estimates for new projects.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 85 citations exist upstream.

References

1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data 1971Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters.2002Underestimating Costs in Public Works Projects: Error or Lie?2003Predicting Accuracy of Early Cost Estimates Using Factor Analysis and Multivariate Regression 1994Attributes of UK construction clients influencing project consultants' performance 2000A survey of current cost estimating practices in the UK

Cited by

2017Estimation of Costs and Durations of Construction of Urban Roads Using ANN and SVM 2015Low estimates – high stakes: underestimation of costs at the front-end of projects 2021Modeling cost overrun in building construction projects using the interpretive structural modeling approach: a developing country perspective 2016A multi-agent systems-based contractor pre-qualification model 2012The accuracy of preliminary cost estimates in Public Works Department (PWD) of Peninsular Malaysia 2016Cost Overruns in Public Sector Investment Projects 2019Exogenous determinants of cost deviations and overruns in local infrastructure projects

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.