The Unity of Luke—Acts in Recent Discussion

Michael F. Bird

23 citations0/0 files storedJournal for the Study of the New Testament

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Biblical Studies and Interpretation Classical Studies and Philology Historical and Linguistic Studies

Abstract

This article surveys the debate about the unity of Luke—Acts in recent scholarship. The study concentrates on monographs and articles written after Mikael C. Parsons and Richard I. Pervo's volume Rethinking the Unity of Luke and Acts, and identifies the recent contribution that reception-history studies have brought to the debate. This is followed with a brief analysis of the flashpoints in the debate, and a discussion of what is at stake for Lukan studies.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 23 citations exist upstream.

References

1987The New Testament in its literary environment 1992The Acts of the Apostles 1999The Acts of the Apostles: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary 1986The narrative unity of Luke-Acts : a literary interpretation 1970Luke: historian and theologian 1993Rethinking the Unity of Luke and Acts 1996The Theology of the Acts of the Apostles 1977Literary Patterns, Theological Themes and the Genre of Luke-Acts

Cited by

2009The Assumed Authorial Unity of Luke and Acts: A Reassessment of the Evidence 2007The Reception of Luke and Acts and the Unity of Luke—Acts

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.