The Kramer-Froehle Controversy: A Contribution to Construct Validity of the FIRO-B Questionnaire

Gerald A. Gluck

11 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Personality Assessment

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychological Testing and Assessment Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Personality Traits and Psychology

Abstract

Replicated the conditions established by Kramer in his attempt to contribute to the construct validation of the FIRO-B. Froehle's apparent later replication produced significantly different results from Kramer's original study. In replicating Kramer's design this researcher wished to establish whether the earlier failure to replicate was due to a difference in design or to an actual lack of construct validity of the FIRO-B. Kramer's findings were supported and an alternative explanation for the difference in Kramer's and Froehle's findings is discussed.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 11 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2001Lesbians Who Abuse Their Partners 1991FIRO-B's DISSOCIATION FROM TWO CENTRAL DIMENSIONS OF INTERPERSONAL BEHAVIOR 1988Interpersonal Orientation and Living Group Preferences: A Validity Check on FIRO-B 1991CONVERGENT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY OF FIRO-B QUESTIONNAIRE

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.