Environmental governance: participatory, multi‐level – and effective?

Jens Newig · Oliver Fritsch

1,001 citations0/0 files storedEnvironmental Policy and Governance

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Public Policy and Administration Research Local Governance and Planning Sustainability and Climate Change Governance

Abstract

Abstract Current political trends and scholarly research increasingly promote collaborative and participatory governance in multi‐level systems as a way to more sustainable and effective environmental policy. Yet empirical findings as well as conceptual works from different academic fields remain ambiguous about this claim. This paper explores whether and to what extent the existence of multiple levels of governance affects the ability of participatory decision‐making to deliver high quality environmental policy output and to improve implementation and compliance. To this end, findings from the literature on multi‐level governance, public participation and policy implementation as well as on complex systems are integrated in five sets of hypotheses. In order to put these to a ‘plausibility probe’, a meta‐analysis of 47 case studies from Northern America and Western Europe is conducted. These cases provide qualitative insights and allow for some generalization in the form of correlation analysis. The study finds that, predominantly, environmental preferences of the involved actors determine the environmental outputs (and outcomes) of decision‐making. Further, face‐to‐face, but not mere two‐way, communication appears to positively influence the ecological standard of decisions. The analysis also suggests that a highly polycentric governance system comprising many agencies and levels of governance yields higher environmental outputs than rather monocentric governance. However, correlations between governance effectiveness and decision‐making scale, as well as policy delivery and institutional fit to ecosystem, could not be identified. The paper concludes by outlining pathways for more systematic comparative research on these pressing research questions. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 1,001 citations exist upstream.

References

1988The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice 2006Why People Obey the Law 1999An Essay on Fiscal Federalism 1971Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method 1997The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses 1995Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism 2003Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance 1961The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry

Cited by

2016Organizational Ecology and Institutional Change in Global Governance 2017The Environmental Performance of Participatory and Collaborative Governance: A Framework of Causal Mechanisms 2018Governing Climate Change 2019Governance for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: How important are participation, policy coherence, reflexivity, adaptation and democratic institutions?2012Towards a Conceptual Framework for The Study of Shifts in Modes of Environmental Governance – Experiences From The Netherlands

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.