Differences in motor imagery times during aroused and relaxed conditions

Abstract

Motor imagery is recognized as an effective method used to enhance motor performance. However, several divergences remain in our understanding of the optimal physiological state required for effective imagery practice. In the present study, participants were required to use imagery in different states: aroused, relaxed, or in a baseline condition. The data revealed that imagery vividness did not differ in the aroused and relaxed condition. However, the ability to reach temporal equivalence between actual and imagined times was significantly greater for both the aroused and the basal conditions, than when performed after a relaxation period. It was concluded that the accuracy, speed, and vividness of the mental images are affected differently depending on the level of arousal experienced before imagery. Finally, it is proposed that relaxation might contribute to a modification of imagery times.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 35 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.