Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Cultural policy explicit and implicit: a distinction and some uses

4 references·16 citing·40 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1929The Public and Its Problems.1,849 cited
1998Culture: A Reformer's Science574 cited
2008The Social Impact of the Arts304 cited
2008The social impact of the arts : an intellectual history167 cited

Cited by

2015Cultural Policy Regimes in Western Europe86 cited
2020Creating and Governing Cultural Heritage in the European Union79 cited
2010Analysing cultural policy: incorrigibly plural or ontologically incompatible?70 cited
2019Explicit and Implicit Diversity Policy in the UK Film and Television Industries48 cited
2015Contemporary cultural diplomacy in South Korea: explicit and implicit approaches43 cited
2015Kulturpolitikkens sedimentering - Kulturløftet som kulturpolitisk vekstperiode34 cited
2015Ambiguity and Cultural Policy33 cited
2020The Korean Wave as a source of implicit cultural policy: Making of a neoliberal subjectivity in a Korean style32 cited
2011Multi-Level Cultural Policy and Politics of European Capitals of Culture31 cited
2021Culture wars? The (re)politicization of Swedish cultural policy31 cited
2009Beyond the competent consumer: the role of media literacy in the making of regulatory policy on children and food advertising in the UK

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

25 cited

2014Hva er kulturpolitikk og kulturpolitisk forskning? - Innledning 1/201421 cited

2020Cultural policy, the public sphere, and public libraries: a comparison of Norwegian, American, and Japanese models20 cited

2021Pursuing decentralisation: regional cultural policies in Finland and Sweden19 cited

2011Strategic canonisation: sanctity, popular culture and the Catholic Church19 cited

2019Arts councils, policy-making and “the local”18 cited