SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Hirsch h Index in a Non-Mainstream Area: Methodology of the Behavioral Sciences in Spain
16 references·0 citing·36 second hop
The Hirsch h Index in a Non-Mainstream Area: Methodology of the Behavioral Sciences in Spain (2009)The Hirsch h Index in a Non-Mainstream Ar…Measuring Co-Authorship and Networking-Adjusted Scientific Impact (2008)Measuring Co-Authorship and N…H-index: however ranked, citations need context (2007)H-index: however ranked, cita…Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks (2007)Generalized Hirsch h-index fo…Eminence of scientists in the light of the h -index and other scientometric indicators (2007)Eminence of scientists in the…Does the h index have predictive power? (2007)Does the h index have predict…The h index and career assessment by numbers (2006)The h index and career assess…Measures for measures (2006)Measures for measuresJournal status (2006)Journal statusIs it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? (2006)Is it possible to compare res…Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups (2006)Comparison of the Hirsch-inde…Not-so-deep impact (2005)Not-so-deep impactDoes the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? (2005)Does the h-index for ranking …An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…Challenging the tyranny of impact factors (2003)Challenging the tyranny of im…The impact-factors debate: the ISI's uses and limits (2002)The impact-factors debate: th…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Why the impact factor of jour…Citation Statistics from 110 Years of Physical Review (2005)Index aims for fair ranking of scientists (2005)Gender Differences in Publication Output: Towards an Unbiased Metric of Research Performance (2006)Gender-Heterogeneous Working Groups Produce Higher Quality Science (2013)Research Weaving: Visualizing the Future of Research Synthesis (2018)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact (2008)h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields (2009)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution (1998)The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level (2007)The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index (2007)Mapping the Evolution of Social Research and Data Science on 30 Years of Social Indicators Research (2020)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship (2010)Understanding Bibliometric Parameters and Analysis (2015)Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields (2017)Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods (2005)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective (2013)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures (1987)Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: A coauthorship network analysis (2009)Popular and/or prestigious? Measures of scholarly esteem (2010)A further step forward in measuring journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR2 indicator (2012)The rise and rise of citation analysis (2007)The state of h index research (2008)An integrated approach for main path analysis: Development of the Hirsch index as an example (2011)Citation Statistics (2009)Big Scholarly Data: A Survey (2017)Early coauthorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers (2019)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
  • 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
  • 2007Does the h index have predictive power?973 cited
  • 2006Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups619 cited
  • 2006Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests?548 cited
  • 2007Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks433 cited
  • 2006Journal status401 cited
  • 2006The h index and career assessment by numbers400 cited
  • 2005Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work?398 cited
  • 2006Measures for measures285 cited
  • 2002The impact-factors debate: the ISI's uses and limits285 cited
  • 2003Challenging the tyranny of impact factors140 cited
  • 2005Not-so-deep impact138 cited
  • 2007Eminence of scientists in the light of the h -index and other scientometric indicators112 cited
  • 2007H-index: however ranked, citations need context105 cited
  • 2008

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Measuring Co-Authorship and Networking-Adjusted Scientific Impact
82 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.