References

• 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
• 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
• 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
• 1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
• 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
• 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
• 1991Publication bias in clinical research3,110 cited
• 1998The Delphi List2,379 cited
• 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
• 1981A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial1,349 cited
• 2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
• 1992Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results853 cited
• 1997Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects820 cited
• 1998Effect of the Statistical Significance of Results on the Time to Completion and Publication of Randomized Efficacy Trials