Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Priority setting for orphan drugs: An international comparison

13 references·3 citing·39 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1998Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory38,630 cited
1998Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions.18,565 cited
1996Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach11,576 cited
2005The SAGE handbook of qualitative research10,183 cited
2005The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 3rd ed.3,025 cited
2003World Development Report 2004 : making services work for poor people1,530 cited
2000The Global Challenge of Health Care Rationing227 cited
2005Drugs for exceptionally rare diseases: do they deserve special status for funding?220 cited
2008Public healthcare resource allocation and the Rule of Rescue190 cited
1998The second phase of priority setting169 cited
2000The global challenge of health care rationing157 cited
2001Priority-setting decisions for new cancer drugs: a qualitative case study111 cited
2000Setting priorities for the adoption of health technologies on a national level — the Israeli experience99 cited

Cited by

2014Are payers treating orphan drugs differently?49 cited
2017Budgetary Impact and Cost Drivers of Drugs for Rare and Ultrarare Diseases

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

47 cited

2020Are supplemental appraisal/reimbursement processes needed for rare disease treatments? An international comparison of country approaches47 cited