The Method Question

Sandra Harding

138 citations0/0 files storedHypatia

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies Gender and Feminist Studies Feminist Theory and Gender Studies

Abstract

A continuing concern of many feminists and non-feminists alike has been to identify a distinctive feminist method of inquiry. This essay argues that this method question is misguided and should be abandoned. In doing so it takes up the distinctions between and relationships among methods, methodologies and epistemologies; proposes that the concern to identify sources of the power of feminist analyses motivates the method question; and suggests how to pursue this project.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 138 citations exist upstream.

References

1963The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 1963The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 1983In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development.1982In A Different Voice: Psychological Theory And Women's Development 1987Science in Action 1987The science question in feminism 1986The Science Question in Feminism 1986Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts

Cited by

2014Beyond activism/academia: militant research and the radical climate and climate justice movement(s)2006Demography of Gender 2020Humboldt, Romantic Science and Ecocide: a Walk in the Woods

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.