The validity of the guilty knowledge technique: The effects of faking.David Thoreson Lykken1960-08-01articleJournal of Applied Psychology230 citationsclosedNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Deception detection and forensic psychologyMemory Processes and InfluencesPsychological Testing and AssessmentAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 230 citations exist upstream.References1959The GSR in the detection of guilt.Cited by2014Memory detection with the C oncealed I nformation T est: A meta analysis of skin conductance, respiration, heart rate, and P300 data2000Using response time measures to assess "guilty knowledge".2000Psychology and Law: Truthfulness, Accuracy and Credibility2001A quantitative review of the Guilty Knowledge Test.1992Detection measures in real-life criminal guilty knowledge tests.2009The Truth about Lying: Inhibition of the Anterior Prefrontal Cortex Improves Deceptive Behavior2008How to Accurately Detect Autobiographical Events1977Physiological measures and the detection of deception.