Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

A COMPARISON OF SEVERAL METHODS OF ASSESSING PARTIAL KNOWLEDGE IN MULTIPLE‐CHOICE TESTS: I. SCORING PROCEDURES*

13 references·2 citing·33 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1963MANUAL FOR KIT OF REFERENCE TESTS FOR COGNITIVE FACTORS (REVISED 1963)897 cited
1969A Test of the Hypothesis that Cronbach's Alpha or Kuder-Richardson Coefficent Twenty is the Same for Two Tests345 cited
1942The prediction of personal adjustment.274 cited
1941The Quantification of a class of attributes : A theory and method of scale construction272 cited
1966Admissible Probability Measurement Procedures257 cited
1970Differential Weighting: A Review of Methods and Empirical Studies196 cited
1965METHODS FOR DISCRIMINATING LEVELS OF PARTIAL KNOWLEDGE CONCERNING A TEST ITEM190 cited
1956The Assessment of Partial Knowledge148 cited
1975FORMULA SCORING AND NUMBER‐RIGHT SCORING 1113 cited
1953Some Modifications of the Multiple-Choice Item87 cited
1954Ability to Avoid Gross Error as a Measure of Achievment66 cited
1959The Effect on Test Reliability and Validity of Scoring Aptitude and Achievement Tests With Weights for Every Choice66 cited
1970A COMPARISON OF THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF TWO METHODS FOR ASSESSING PARTIAL KNOWLEDGE ON A MULTIPLE‐CHOICE TEST48 cited

Cited by

1988Multiple True‐False Items: A Study of Interitem Correlations, Scoring Alternatives, and Reliability Estimation40 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1999Guessing in Multiple Choice Tests38 cited