Activity theory and ontology

Abstract

This paper seeks to re‐examine Yrio Engeström’s activity theory as a technology of knowledge designed to enable positive transformations of specific practices. The paper focuses on a key paper where Engeström defines the nature and present state of activity theory. Beginning with a brief account of the relations between activity theory and ontology, the paper asserts that Engeström’s take on Vygotsky is restricted by a commitment to a progressive, apolitical ideology of improvement. The paper goes on to consider Vygotsky’s metaphysics in relation to Heidegger’s elaboration of ontology, and Engeström’s elaboration of what activity theory is and of its global mission. Engeström’s activity theory is defined in terms of its expression of a will‐to‐power and is questioned in terms of its lack of engagement with the philosophical tradition it claims to inherit and its misappropriation of the Vygotskian legacy.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 30 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.