SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Selecting Your Editorial Board: Maintaining Standards
6 references·0 citing·28 second hop
Selecting Your Editorial Board: Maintaining Standards (2013)Selecting Your Editorial Board: Maintaini…Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals (2012)Best peer reviewers and the q…Familiarizing with science editors' associations (2011)Familiarizing with science ed…Biomedical journal editing: elements of success (2011)Biomedical journal editing: e…Who is afraid of reviewers’ comments? Or, why anything can be published and anything can be cited (2010)Who is afraid of reviewers’ c…Should editors influence journal impact factors? (2009)Should editors influence jour…Small scientific journals from small countries: breaking from a vicious circle of inadequacy. (1999)Small scientific journals fro…Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: Writing and editing for biomedical publication (2010)Essential Components of Educational Programs on Biomedical Writing, Editing, and Publishing (2015)Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? (2003)Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor (2008)Ethical Aspects and Dilemmas of Preparing, Writing and Publishing of the Scientific Papers in the Biomedical Journals (2012)Choosing the Target Journal: Do Authors Need a Comprehensive Approach? (2013)Editorial Strategy to Get a Scholarly Journal Indexed by Scopus (2021)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)How to review a scientific paper (2014)Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature (2019)Self-Citation, Cumulative Advantage, and Gender Inequality in Science (2020)The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review (1990)Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)Self-correction in biomedical publications and the scientific impact (2014)What We Still Don't Know About Peer Review (2016)Integrity of clinical research conduct, reporting, publishing, and post-publication promotion in rheumatology (2020)Lost Science in the Third World (1995)Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews (1996)Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German (1997)Academic misconduct among medical students in a post‐communist country (2004)Manuscript editing as a way of teaching academic writing: Experience from a small scientific journal (2005)Open is not forever: A study of vanished open access journals (2021)Editorial: Self-citation in Publishing (2010)An index to evaluate the quality of taxonomic publications (2011)On the skewness of journal self‐citations and publisher self‐citations: Cues for discussion from a case study (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1999Small scientific journals from small countries: breaking from a vicious circle of inadequacy.105 cited
  • 2012Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals47 cited
  • 2009Should editors influence journal impact factors?36 cited
  • 2011Biomedical journal editing: elements of success35 cited
  • 2010Who is afraid of reviewers’ comments? Or, why anything can be published and anything can be cited35 cited
  • 2011Familiarizing with science editors' associations18 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work