Professor H. H. ROWLEY, who has repeatedly affirmed that the Book of Daniel was produced by a single person during the persecution of the Jewish religion by Antiochus IV, has recently taken up the cudgels again in behalf of his favorite theory 1). While his jihad is waged against all divisive theories, the pertinent sections of my pertinent monograph 2) are its main targets, even as they are obviously the immediate occasion for it. It is calculated to convince not a few readers who have not thoroughly mastered my opuscule; but audiatur et altera pars. I first of all, with what ROWLEY admits is a growing number of others writers, divide the Book of Daniel into two roughly equal parts: Daniel A, Book of Courtier Tales, comprising chs. i-vi, which is pre-Epiphanian; and Daniel B, Book of Apocalypses, comprising chs. vii-xii, which is Epiphanian. The respective starting-points for the analyses of the two parts are two chapters -ii and vii whose similarities are obvious but whose differences
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 24 citations exist upstream.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.