Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The Assessment of the Quality of Reporting of Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analyses in Diagnostic Tests Published by Authors in China

13 references·5 citing·42 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
2011QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies14,163 cited
2010Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement12,147 cited
2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration10,571 cited
2014International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems3,570 cited
2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative3,215 cited
2002Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines960 cited
2003Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy.862 cited
2006Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies769 cited
2007External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)569 cited
2004Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies372 cited
2010The PRISMA Statement: A Guideline for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses232 cited
2011The assessment of the quality of reporting of meta-analyses in diagnostic research: a systematic review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

71 cited

Cited by

2017Variable methodological quality and use found in systematic reviews referenced in STEMI clinical practice guidelines24 cited
2021Clinical Epidemiology in China series. Paper 3: The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published by China' researchers in English-language is higher than those published in Chinese-language17 cited
2024Evaluation of Compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines for Conducting and Reporting Systematic Reviews in Three Major Periodontology Journals14 cited
2016Reporting completeness and transparency of meta-analyses of depression screening tool accuracy: A comparison of meta-analyses published before and after the PRISMA statement14 cited
2021A Reporting Quality Assessment of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Sports Physical Therapy: A Review of Reviews13 cited