This article draws on historical sociology, in particular on historical institutionalism, in order to critique the micro, macro and meso-levels of contemporary International Relations theory.It develops a conjunctural, mid-range approach focusing on institutional development, change and disintegration that aims to capture the extent and scale of processes of large-scale change in the international realm.The article seeks to broaden this argument by outlining the broader possibilities of historical sociology to International Relations theory and practice.
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 89 citations exist upstream.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.