this work references cited by second hopReferences
- 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
- 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
- 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
- 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
- 1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
- 2008Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies3,395 cited
- 2001Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis2,229 cited
- 2007Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis1,879 cited
- 2001Systematic Reviews in Health Care1,692 cited
- 2008Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses1,117 cited
- 2008Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive—Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses917 cited
- 2008Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses?834 cited
- 1993The Science of Reviewing Researcha473 cited
Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work