SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Summing Up: The Science of Reviewing Research Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, 1984, xiii+191 pp
0 references·10 citing·45 second hop
Summing Up: The Science of Reviewing Research Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, 1984, xiii+191 pp (1986)Summing Up: The Science of Reviewing Rese…Investigating and dealing with publication bias and other reporting biases in meta‐analyses of health research: A review (2020)Investigating and dealing wit…A methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of antidepressants effect on low back pain using updated AMSTAR (2020)A methodological quality asse…A historical review of publication bias (2020)A historical review of public…Resilience in agri-food supply chains: a critical analysis of the literature and synthesis of a novel framework (2018)Resilience in agri-food suppl…Internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2016)Internet-delivered cognitive …Publication bias: what is it? How do we measure it? How do we avoid it? (2013)Publication bias: what is it?…Publication Bias in Reports of Animal Stroke Studies Leads to Major Overstatement of Efficacy (2010)Publication Bias in Reports o…Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 3: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Randomized Trials (2009)Evidence-Based Medicine, Syst…Using Research to Inform Healthcare Managers' And Policy Makers' Questions: From Summative to Interpretive Synthesis (2005)Using Research to Inform Heal…Publication and related biases. (2000)Publication and related biase…The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Attention Bias Modification (ABM): Review of Effects of Multisession ABM Training on Anxiety and Threat-Related Attention in High-Anxious Individuals (2017)The relationship between television exposure and children’s cognition and behaviour: A systematic review (2017)A guide to guidelines for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder in adults: An update. (2019)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Reproducibility in Science (2014)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Analysis of Growth of Interventional Techniques in Managing Chronic Pain in the Medicare Population: A 10-Year Evaluation from 1997 to 2006 (2009)Revisiones sistemáticas de la literatura. Qué se debe saber acerca de ellas (2011)Serie de Redacción Científica: Revisiones Sistemáticas (2021)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis (2017)Internet‐delivered psychological treatments: from innovation to implementation (2019)Challenges and burden of the Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic for child and adolescent mental health: a narrative review to highlight clinical and research needs in the acute phase and the long return to normality (2020)Book Reviews: Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis Larry V. Hedges and Ingram Olkin New York: Academic Press, 1985. xxii + 369 pp (1988)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The Construct of Resilience: A Critical Evaluation and Guidelines for Future Work (2000)Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review (2003)Building the Resilient Supply Chain (2004)The Evolution of Resilience in Supply Chain Management: A Retrospective on Ensuring Supply Chain Resilience (2019)A systematic literature review of the capabilities and performance metrics of supply chain resilience (2020)Trends and applications of resilience analytics in supply chain modeling: systematic literature review in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Introduction to PRISMA 2020 and implications for research synthesis methodologists (2021)The Perils of Misinterpreting and Misusing “Publication Bias” in Meta-analyses: An Education Review on Funnel Plot-Based Methods (2023)The state of hiring discrimination: A meta-analysis of (almost) all recent correspondence experiments (2023)Meta-Ethnography (1988)Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions (2005)Reframing Evidence Synthesis As Rhetorical Action in the Policy Making Drama (2006)Evidence-Based Policymaking: A Critique (2009)Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach (2012)Methods for testing publication bias in ecological and evolutionary meta‐analyses (2021)Conducting Meta-analyses of Proportions in R (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2010Publication Bias in Reports of Animal Stroke Studies Leads to Major Overstatement of Efficacy603 cited
  • 2018Resilience in agri-food supply chains: a critical analysis of the literature and synthesis of a novel framework459 cited
  • 2000Publication and related biases.432 cited
  • 2020Investigating and dealing with publication bias and other reporting biases in meta‐analyses of health research: A review311 cited
  • 2016Internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis308 cited
  • 2013Publication bias: what is it? How do we measure it? How do we avoid it?298 cited
  • 2009Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 3: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Randomized Trials191 cited
  • 2020A historical review of publication bias182 cited
  • 2005Using Research to Inform Healthcare Managers' And Policy Makers' Questions: From Summative to Interpretive Synthesis120 cited
  • 2020A methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of antidepressants effect on low back pain using updated AMSTAR10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work