SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematic Evaluation of the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials in Diabetes
13 references·6 citing·35 second hopsampled
Systematic Evaluation of the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials in Diabetes (2006)Systematic Evaluation of the Quality of R…The undue influence of significant p-values on the perceived importance of study results (2005)The undue influence of signif…The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement (2005)The quality of randomized tri…Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study (2005)Comparison of descriptions of…An analysis of general medical and specialist journals that endorse CONSORT found that reporting was not enforced consistently (2005)An analysis of general medica…Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 2. Measures of precision (confidence intervals) (2004)Tips for learners of evidence…Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement (2004)Better Reporting of Harms in …An observational study found that authors of randomized controlled trials frequently use concealment of randomization and blinding, despite the failure to report these methods (2004)An observational study found …The reporting of methodological factors in randomized controlled trials and the association with a journal policy to promote adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist (2002)The reporting of methodologic…In the dark The reporting of blinding status in randomized controlled trials (2002)In the dark The reporting of …Value of Flow Diagrams in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials (2001)Value of Flow Diagrams in Rep…The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revise…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Physician Interpretations and Textbook Definitions of Blinding Terminology in Randomized Controlled Trials (2001)Physician Interpretations and…Endorsement of reporting guidelines and study registration by endocrine and internal medicine journals: meta-epidemiological study (2019)Endorsement of reporting guid…Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in chiropractic using the CONSORT checklist (2016)Quality of reporting of rando…CONSORT Adherence in Journals Is Still Far From Perfect (2014)CONSORT Adherence in Journals…An assessment of the reporting quality of randomised controlled trials relating to anti-arrhythmic agents (2002–2011) (2013)An assessment of the reportin…Outcomes in Registered, Ongoing Randomized Controlled Trials of Patient Education (2012)Outcomes in Registered, Ongoi…[Clinical trials published in Revista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación: characteristics and quality of design]. (2007)[Clinical trials published in…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)A Systematic Evaluation of the Impact of STRICTA and CONSORT Recommendations on Quality of Reporting for Acupuncture Trials (2008)A review of reporting of participant recruitment and retention in RCTs in six major journals (2009)Method and reporting quality in health professions education research: a systematic review (2011)Reporting results of cancer treatment (1981)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement (2007)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)THE QUALITY OF REPORTING OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY FROM 1988 THROUGH 2000 (2002)Turning a blind eye: the success of blinding reported in a random sample of randomised, placebo controlled trials (2004)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)CONSORT Revised—Improving the Reporting of Randomized Trials (2001)A multidimensional meta-analysis of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder (2004)The effects of excluding patients from the analysis in randomised controlled trials: meta-epidemiological study (2009)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)The Reporting of Randomized Clinical Trials Using a Surgical Intervention Is in Need of Immediate Improvement (2006)Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research (2019)The importance of allocation concealment and patient blinding in osteoarthritis trials: A meta‐epidemiologic study (2009)Psychological therapies for pathological and problem gambling (2012)Specific instructions for estimating unclearly reported blinding status in randomized trials were reliable and valid (2011)Collaborative care for depression in primary care (2006)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. (2015)SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials (2025)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials2,545 cited
  • 2004Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement1,588 cited
  • 2001Value of Flow Diagrams in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials316 cited
  • 2001Physician Interpretations and Textbook Definitions of Blinding Terminology in Randomized Controlled Trials256 cited
  • 2005The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement216 cited
  • 2004An observational study found that authors of randomized controlled trials frequently use concealment of randomization and blinding, despite the failure to report these methods209 cited
  • 2005Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study209 cited
  • 2002In the dark The reporting of blinding status in randomized controlled trials173 cited
  • 2002The reporting of methodological factors in randomized controlled trials and the association with a journal policy to promote adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist167 cited
  • 2004Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 2. Measures of precision (confidence intervals)78 cited
  • 2005An analysis of general medical and specialist journals that endorse CONSORT found that reporting was not enforced consistently

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

76 cited
  • 2005The undue influence of significant p-values on the perceived importance of study results40 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2012Outcomes in Registered, Ongoing Randomized Controlled Trials of Patient Education24 cited
    • 2016Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in chiropractic using the CONSORT checklist22 cited
    • 2019Endorsement of reporting guidelines and study registration by endocrine and internal medicine journals: meta-epidemiological study16 cited
    • 2007[Clinical trials published in Revista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación: characteristics and quality of design].15 cited
    • 2013An assessment of the reporting quality of randomised controlled trials relating to anti-arrhythmic agents (2002–2011)14 cited
    • 2014CONSORT Adherence in Journals Is Still Far From Perfect9 cited