SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Fine-Tuning Peer Review
0 references·7 citing·17 second hop
Fine-Tuning Peer Review (1984)Fine-Tuning Peer ReviewThe reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)The reliability of peer revie…Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review (1991)Reliability, fairness, object…Referee agreement in context (1991)Referee agreement in contextIn praise of randomness (1991)In praise of randomnessDoes the need for agreement among reviewers inhibit the publication controversial findings? (1991)Does the need for agreement a…Does group discussion contribute reliability of complex judgments? (1991)Does group discussion contrib…Much ado about Peer Review (1986)Much ado about Peer ReviewA Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Peer review for journals: Evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation (1997)Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping (2014)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)How Much Better Are the Most-Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic Publication (2005)Scientific peer review (2011)Bias in peer review (2012)Lessons from the Darsee Affair (1983)Funding Science: The Real Defects of Peer Review and An Alternative To It (1985)Open Science and Closed Science: Tradeoffs in a Democracy (1985)Scientific Research in Education (2002)Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review (2005)Scientific Utopia (2012)Do men and women perform academic work differently? (2015)Research Program Peer Review: Purposes, Principles, Practices, Protocols (2004)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 1991The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation502 cited
  • 1991Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review55 cited
  • 1991Does the need for agreement among reviewers inhibit the publication controversial findings?39 cited
  • 1991Referee agreement in context12 cited
  • 1991In praise of randomness7 cited
  • 1986Much ado about Peer Review7 cited
  • 1991Does group discussion contribute reliability of complex judgments?0 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work