Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

How ambitious are China and India’s emissions intensity targets?

7 references·5 citing·57 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1997Postwar U.S. Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation7,358 cited
1991A Generalized Production Frontier Approach for Estimating Determinants of Inefficiency in U.S. Dairy Farms1,155 cited
2002Technological Change, Technological Catch-up, and Capital Deepening: Relative Contributions to Growth and Convergence698 cited
2000Corruption, Pollution, and the Kuznets Environment Curve542 cited
2011Emissions targets and the real business cycle: Intensity targets versus caps or taxes336 cited
2007Optimal intensity targets for greenhouse gas emissions trading under uncertainty107 cited
2003Estimation of technical inefficiency effects using panel data and doubly heteroscedastic stochastic production frontiers67 cited

Cited by

2016Determining factors and diverse scenarios of CO2 emissions intensity reduction to achieve the 40–45% target by 2020 in China – a historical and prospective analysis for the period 2005–202076 cited
2012China's 2020 carbon intensity target: Consistency, implementations, and policy implications74 cited
2014Deepening Reform for China's Long-term Growth and Development65 cited
2020Identification of the key factors affecting Chinese carbon intensity and their historical trends using random forest algorithm57 cited
2020Does factor market distortion affect industrial pollution intensity? Evidence from China56 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work